2019 – 67 – psychology

Psychology: A Culture of Deceit

Hello friend,

Two articles caught my eye recently in Inside Time. Firstly, it emerged at an employment tribunal that the MoJ were told in 2012 that its Sex Offender Treatment Programmes (SOPT) made sexual offenders more likely to reoffend. The MoJ blocked Kathryn Hopkins’ report from being published – even after her report passed a peer review and was recommended for publishing. It was another 5 years before another group of researchers vindicated Ms Hopkins’ findings – her name was left off the published report because, it was claimed, ‘she would tell everybody about the history of the report’.

Let me see if I understand, instead of suspending SOPT until Ms Hopkins’ findings could be verified, the MoJ carried on regardless of the consequences to the future victims of offences perpetrated by ‘graduates’ of this dangerous ‘offending behaviour programme’ (OBP). Further, at the same time. they were continuing to block prisoners’ progression (mine included) for the reason that they had not reduced their risk by engaging and completing SOPT. This is scandalous and people within the MoJ and the psychologists themselves should be held accountable.

It gets worse: the second article exposed further deceit. The charity Transfer Justice, announced that many OBPs have not been checked to see what their outcomes are, i.e reoffending. Between 2010 and 2018, 16,434 prisoners attended 25 non-evaluated OBPs; plus, over 100,000 serving community sentences.

As above, prisoners are being blocked from progressing and returning to their families on the basis that their risk has not been reduced from attending a OBP which may not have even been evaluated. Like SOTP, these courses could actually be increasing risk and creating more crime.

Psychologists use a term to describe a certain type of lifestyle: parasitic lifestyle. If you move in with a girlfriend or have a period of unemployment and rely on benefits, they label you as having a parasitic lifestyle. It’s a very misleading and deeply offensive term. I ask them this: what do you call someone who takes money and gives nothing of any worth in return? You don’t need me to supply the answer.

I hope Scottish Prisons will be more progressive in their approach.

Be happy, be safe and be kind.
Graham Coutts, 27th October 2019

5 Comments on "2019-67-psychology"

    • Hi Sarah,
      Thanks for the comment and site address. Will try and get this printed and sent to Graham as he doesn’t have direct access to the internet. He will respond in due course.

    • Hi Sarah, nice to hear from you again. The review of ‘Bad Psychology’ made some interesting points. However, given that the book undermines the supposed expertise of psychologists and the review was written by a forensic psychologist, his position is of no surprise. Whilst we are all prone to a little (or a lot of) confirmation bias. I’ve experienced and witnessed the inadequacies of prison psychology that Robert A. Forde evidences in his book. Why would any highly paid and respected psychologist admit that they are not as good as they think or say they are? Until someone in a position of power recognises that the experiment of wholesale prison psychology has failed, and implements a radical change, reoffending will continue the dialogue. Take care.

  • Thanks for your opinion and sound reasoning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.